Clinical pharmacy service Contract review: Which Quality Measures and Escalation Clauses Matter?
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
- What should a contract review checklist cover?
- Which quality measures show how the service is performing?
- How should unresolved clinical pharmacy actions be tracked?
- Which escalation clauses matter most?
- What should a remedial action plan contain?
A contract review should establish whether the clinical pharmacy service delivers safe, completed work, and what happens when it falls short. Delivered hours and processed tasks describe activity, not assurance. For PCN leaders commissioning clinical pharmacist services, that gap can leave clinical risks unresolved and responsibilities unclear.
Key takeaways
- Activity is not assurance: task counts do not prove clinical work was completed.
- Thresholds need a clock: agree the population, source and what counts as complete.
- Unresolved work needs an owner: accepting a task is not the same as resolving it.
- Escalation runs on two tracks: an escalation matrix should separate clinical urgency from contract process.
What should a contract review checklist cover?
A contract review checklist should cover five areas, from the governing documents to evidence that improvement held.
- Confirm the governing documents.
- Test completion, not activity.
- Review unresolved actions.
- Check escalation and remedial clauses.
- Verify improvement before closing.

Treat contract monitoring as continuous, not annual. Service level agreement monitoring should show trends across months, and an escalation matrix should name a person and a deputy. Begin with your own agreement. Our clinical pharmacist services page explains how we deliver this work. Our comparison of clinical pharmacist providers covers provider selection.
Which quality measures show how the service is performing?
A balanced dashboard reveals more than one completion percentage.
| Measure | What to test |
|---|---|
| Medicines reconciliation | Whether discrepancies were resolved, not logged |
| High-risk medicines | Whether overdue monitoring was identified and acted on |
| Medication reviews | Whether reviews show a decision and completed follow-up |
NICE sets a benchmark: the GP record should hold a reconciled medicines list within one week of receiving discharge information, and before a prescription or new supply is issued (NICE QS120, quality statement 5). The clock starts on receipt, not discharge. In primary care services, task counts alone do not demonstrate clinical quality or completion.

Need a clearer view of clinical pharmacy performance and unresolved work?
Discuss clinical pharmacy service reviewHow should unresolved clinical pharmacy actions be tracked?
“Reviewed”, “forwarded” and “awaiting GP” are different stages across primary care services, and none means the issue is resolved.
| Status | Meaning to agree locally |
|---|---|
| Received | The work has entered the queue |
| In progress | Action has started, with a named owner |
| Awaiting another party | A named dependency is outstanding |
| Resolved | The agreed endpoint is recorded |
A handoff closes only when a named person accepts responsibility for it. Accepting a task is not the same as resolving the clinical issue behind it. Show outstanding items by age and clinical urgency alongside overall performance.

Which escalation clauses matter most?

An escalation matrix should set out what happens when performance falls short, not just who to tell.
| Clause | What it should make clear |
|---|---|
| Trigger | Safety concerns, repeated failures or missed deadlines |
| Interim safeguards | Who protects patients during the investigation |
| Response deadlines | Separate times for acknowledgement, decision and resolution |
| Repeated failures | What happens if the same failure returns |
| Evidence of closure | What proves the remedy worked |
A patient-safety concern should not wait for the next service meeting. A contract review should test whether acknowledgement, clinical decisions and resolution meet their agreed deadlines.
Expert insight from Adeem Azhar, qualified Clinical Pharmacist and CEO
Contracts that protect patients name accountable roles and their deputies. When everyone assumes someone else is chasing an overdue action, nobody is.
Adeem Azhar, MPharm, IPres
Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer – Core Prescribing Solutions
Qualified Clinical Pharmacist
What should a remedial action plan contain?
“Provide refresher training” is a weak remedy. A stronger plan names the cause, reviews affected patients and changes workflow, capacity or supervision. It sets an owner, deadline and evidence. Your clinical governance framework should make that routine.

FAQs
Make clinical pharmacy contract performance measurable and accountable
Core Prescribing Solutions can provide Clinical Pharmacist support built around defined workstreams, clear ownership, governance and reporting. If you are reviewing an existing arrangement or commissioning a new service, we can discuss how completion measures, escalation routes and follow-up expectations should be reflected in delivery.
Discuss your clinical pharmacy service
01274 442076







